Login/Register  
notchet.com media feed

Laser Targeting UAV, Evidence of Military Technology on 9/11



Uploaded by: uruk
Video Description:
Watch this video at
www.youtube.com/freedomlover911
Thanks for all of the comments and research assistance in the past several months since I first uploaded a raw version of this evidence. I hope this is presented in a way that creates more understanding in what occurred at the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Please rate, leave your comments and pass this on to everyone!
UPDATE:
Also now on Google Video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4650204243222697402
Here is a very interesting link I found pertaining to remote control aircraft and military drones:
http://911exposed.org/Missile.htm
**********************************
Added July 25, 2008 -Reply to FAQs:
The laser movement was one item that confused me for awhile as I do know that LDs are typically stationary. It wasn't until I found the UAV moving at high speeds that it made sense. Also finding the reflections from above (in the smoke) and on the FNM building exposed the angle and approach of the source (the airborne platform). Observing the flight path and timing of the UAV makes this more clear. Had the UAV been following (behind) the Boeing it (the Laser signature) would have been stationary.
Here is where I have to insert my own theory: the UAV was off of the intended flight path and approached from the SW instead of S as the Boeing traveled. It may have been late to the target and in order to catch up, it cut the angle and projected the laser just moments before impact. Also, this UAV drone likely equipped with a Williams Research turbine jet has a max speed of approx 250mph and the Boeing was traveling at least twice that fast. Because of the laser appearing on the building in the foreground (appears to be next to towers) I have estimated that the UAV must be at a much higher altitude and actually out over the bay at the time of the targeting operation.
As you can see in the video, the moment sensors on the Boeing pick up the laser, the remote controlled plane banks to port (left) and hits just below the laser. The plane appeared to be slightly off course as well. Had the laser been done correctly and timely, the plane would have had more time to correct and would have hit the target on center just like the N Tower job.
This would explain both the moving laser AND why the plane suddenly turned. Had a human pilot been on the plane, there would have been no way at those speeds to detect and correct an off-target approach. The maneuver was entirely mechanical.
You may find it interesting that I give credit to Killtown for helping me find the reflections of the laser. He did a "hit piece" video to show the reflection (paper) on the FNM building. Seeing this I postulated that there may be another reflection in the smoke and I knew where to look now (45 degrees up and to the left). I looked closely and viola! There it was! Perfect timing and brilliance. It all came together.
This confirmed for me at least that all of these associated pieces meant that the plane was real, remote controlled and laser guided.
Here is another FAQ "what happened to the passengers?"
http://69.28.73.17/thornarticles/911passengerlist.html
Reposted here:
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=7199
And here:
http://philjayhan.wordpress.com/category/flight-175/
Video links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDshVgRx2Xw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGRyotcPh4
More analysis of the "dot" by "ABC1416" here (thanks for the lead SpudXXXX!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXfaVz...
One other FAQ:
"why does the laser appear to 'go through' the tower? It couldn't possibly be a reflection!",
and response:
I made the same mistake at first!
You are seeing an optical 2D illusion that makes it appear to "go through" the building. First thing I had to do was to identify that green top building. I looked long and hard on Google Earth for that building and discovered the "Federal National Memorial Building". Turns out it is about six blocks away to the SE. You are actually seeing the reflection off the south side of the south tower to the west side of the FNMB. Most people confuse this building with the Woolworth Building, but upon closer inspection you can see the differences. That is why I point out the two in the video. Pay close attention to the annotations.
Explanation of Laser Designation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_designator
***********************************
Northwoods Document:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
"drone (unmanned)" on pg 8 (3/b). Page 9 section 6, "military drone aircraft" and "modifying an aircraft" to appear as a Cuban Mig. Page 10 section 8 describes how a "passenger" plane would be disguised and shot down with a fake passenger list.
Also on page 8, section 2/a/11 "mock victims". More about fake passengers...
*******************************
Please feel free to comment!
Peace
FL911
****************************

Related Videos
How to Make a Burning LaserMilitary Air Drop BloopersSHEEPLE DON`T HAVE ANY FORM OF LOGIC - PROOF
how-to-make-a-burning-laser.htmlhow-to-make-a-burning-laser.htmlhow-to-make-a-burning-laser.html
The MilitaryFuture Weapons Airborne LaserFuture Weapons: Global Hawk - UAV
how-to-make-a-burning-laser.htmlhow-to-make-a-burning-laser.htmlhow-to-make-a-burning-laser.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
A fireball does not ... ( 3 weeks ago by sielvast)
A fireball does not provide a reflective surface for the 'beam' to reflect off of. I do not see conclusive proof from this video. It seems to me you need to do a bit more research.
Array ( 3 weeks ago by Agentoxedo07)
holy-terrorist:> im the hacker. that technologie *=*
lmfao! did you miss ... ( 3 weeks ago by Gunittimothy)
lmfao! did you miss sex to research this theory.
Troofers make my ... ( 3 weeks ago by webobject)
Troofers make my arsehole pucker.
The creator of this ... ( 2 weeks ago by sickgreg)
The creator of this video is only trying to send people in the wrong direction by using the keyword military in a rubbish video like this. The military technology used that really matters here is the explosives which brought the buildings down, leaving only mainly steel and dust powdered so finely ONLY explosives can explain it. There's too many videos made to confuse people.
Go to google videos. search "richard gage". Watch the 2 hour vids. Also "entire steven jones". Also "jim hoffman"
Its just a piece of ... ( 2 weeks ago by bombthreatent)
Its just a piece of debris from the first plane crash.
i have done some ... ( 2 weeks ago by w0bbl3r)
i have done some research on controlled demo jobs, and EVERY time there are huge sounding explosions, and very visible flashes. none of these were evident on 9/11, therefore it is impossible to have been CD.
also, how many other buildings do you know that have been hit by 767's doing over 500 MPH? and how many of them acted differently to the towers?
answer that and you will notice you have no other frame of reference, so it is unfeasible to say it COULDNT happen like that.
it HAS been proven!!
what about WTC7 ?? ... ( 2 weeks ago by uruk)
what about WTC7 ?? no plane and a building falling down.. ?? hummm
what about the HUGE ... ( 2 weeks ago by w0bbl3r)
what about the HUGE amount of damage caused by the debris that was flung into it from the impact? and the fires started by this?
all very easily explained, AND proven scientifically
and STILL no ... ( 2 weeks ago by w0bbl3r)
and STILL no explosion sounds, or bright flashes that you see and hear with EVERY CD drop?
this is not possible.
and you still didnt tell me how they got the ENTIRE CITY OF NEW YORK to lie, and say they saw planes if there werent any?
and how do you ... ( 2 weeks ago by w0bbl3r)
and how do you explain that fire doesnt provide a reflective surface for your "laser pointer" theory to bounce off of?
thats also impossible, isnt it???
use your tiny brain, and even you will see this.
dont be so hasty to believe something just because you want to
WTC7 ?? use your " ... ( 2 weeks ago by uruk)
WTC7 ?? use your "no brain" bro.
bye bye
could someone check ... ( 2 weeks ago by noonesflower)
could someone check if the TV archives have those little white dots. Seems this gut could be easily photoshopping a hhoax. Not that i give his silly theory any credence. The theory backed by the most evidence is that of controlled demolition.
More conspiracy ... ( 1 week ago by justdoodleit)
More conspiracy theory! The thing about technology is that one can distort it to prove anything in hindsight, but rarely can use it to prevent disaster in foresight.
Thankfully there is no high definition footage of pearl harbor or USS Arizona sinking, otherwise we'd have more lame videos dissecting how it was an inside job and an excuse to nuke japan!
suck yourself ( 6 days ago by bert0mac)
suck yourself
Congratulations, ... ( 6 days ago by Eliecer140)
Congratulations, it's very interesting
The evidence is a ... ( 6 days ago by NewDescartes)
The evidence is a dot? Not very convincing, considering the gov has a taped confession from Bin Laden.
Its because its not ... ( 6 days ago by NewDescartes)
Its because its not true. Crazy Muslims, like the ones killing our soldiers in Iraq, brought the towers down.
I check 6 different ... ( 5 days ago by ThatUJohnWayne)
I check 6 different angles of the Crash and not one had the dot.
Epic Fail. ( 4 days ago by RollingStone139)
Epic Fail.
This man's theory ... ( 3 days ago by brightsunshineyday)
This man's theory doesn't contradict the controlled demolition theory. This man is simply discussing the airplane's trajectory. Does that make sense to you now?
okay so the missle ... ( 18 hours ago by mamsypamsy)
okay so the missle is a plan? lawl your a retard
so who went to Iraq ... ( 8 hours ago by sandokankan30)
so who went to Iraq ?Did germany go!...why arent german soldiers duyng?
so who went to Iraq ... ( 5 hours ago by sandokankan30)
so who went to Iraq ?Did germany go!...why arent german soldiers duyng?


URL 
Embed Code 
 

The Sexy Candice Hillebrand
[video]

Gold Miner
[game]

Rugby Pantsing
[picture]

Gods Gift to Us is Canadian Girls
[video]

Babycal Throw
[game]

Baghdad Bowling
[game]
 
Most Recent Videos
Most Viewed Videos
Top Rated Videos
Search:
 

The Sexy Candice Hillebrand
[video]

Endless Zombie Rampage
[game]

Gods Gift to Us is Canadian Girls
[video]

Mini Putt 2
[game]

Mini-putt 2
[game]

Rugby Pantsing
[picture]
 
Google.com
Yahoo.com
 

heart broken
[video]

Babycal Throw
[game]

Baghdad Bowling
[game]

Avoid It
[game]

Aventura Magica
[game]

Attack Of The Fever Heads
[game]
Linkfriends 1 | 2 | 3
Halo 3 Forums | Free Online Flash Games | Web Directory
SpLi 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Copyright 2006 notchet.com - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy - Sitemap