 |
|
||
|
|||
9 - Human Ancestry Made EasyUploaded by: potholer54 Video Description: This video traces our migration out of Africa and explains, through DNA evidence, how humans colonized the world. It is part of the Made Easy series of videos that show the evidence of our origins, from the Big Bang onwards. (Music: "Allegretto" by Bond and "The Ballad of Henry Darger" by Natalie Merchant.) Tags for this video: atheism christianity creation evolution fundamentalism god human Potholer54 science Find more videos in the "Education" category See more videos uploaded by potholer54
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide |
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Halo 3 Forums | Free Online Flash Games | Web Directory
SpLi 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
If I could change it, I would.
5-star video.
if food stops being delivered in the city (where i live) today and out of "necessity" i go out in my yard and plant a garden i will surely starve before i see the first green shoots or sprouts. this the equivalent to jumping out of plane and knitting a parachute on the way down... it makes no sense.
any thoughts?
But early farmers didn't live in cities. They lived in rural settlements and hunted and gathered their food. When nature couldn't provide enough of these resources, early famers had to make up the difference themselves. They certainly didn't starve to death before the first harvest, because wild food is still out there.
if food was still out there to provide plenty in this time of "necessary-transition" they must of possessed an unparalleled foresight?
couldn't farming/hunting or 'mostly' agricultural peoples of existed? nothing else suggested even seems plausible.
there aren't any peoples (indigenous) on earth that are ignorant of how plants grow. in one way or another all did some "gardening" or weeding at least for the plants they favored.
As I said, =when nature couldn't provide enough of these resources=. As long as you can go out and harvest wild wheat, why go to the trouble of planting it? You plant it when the wild wheat starts to get scarce.
that the most labor intensive style of agriculture would be somehow an adaptive imperative after having lived a leisured life style for so long is nonsensical.
not to mention this style of agriculture is inherently connected with starvation/famine and destroys the topsoil making deserts wherever it is used.
No, no foretelling of the future was needed. Please see my earlier two replies: =When nature couldn't provide enough of these resources, early famers had to make up the difference themselves.=
not trying to annoy or otherwise argue thought you might possess more than just one perspective.
do you know jared diamonds works btw?
/watch?v=IESYMFtLIis&feature=channel_page
Because the female is our most recent common matrilineal ancestor. The male is our most recent common patrilineal ancestor. The male is more recent because males are more promiscuous.