Let's look at the security at the time. It sucked. What foreknoledge? They hit the WTC once before and wanted to finish the job. It's as simple as that. And the fact the US drilled for such an event means it was conceivable. Physics will show you that a falling structure of that size won't be stopped by floors, not even slow down enough to measure. All the stuff that need to happen for the conspiracy to work is much more elaborate than the simple fact that cavemen can be smart.
Why are the ...( 1 day ago by sbrenn)
Why are the statements of the firemen always truncated? They give explainations for what they heard. Electrical explosions, Rivets breaking and popping. But no... those statements always get snipped. I wonder why?
ppl please it hase ...( 1 day ago by waltthefart333)
ppl please it hase taken over 7 years now but the truth is right here here how much money do you think there is in war?
Note:The impact of ...( 1 day ago by JoeMiozza)
Note:The impact of the planes destroyed a significant number of the perimeter columns on several floors of the building, severely weakening the structure. This is not a redistributable, single column failure. And enough with the 1975 fire. There were NO STRUCTURAL FAILURES, impacts, and no jet fuel in conjunction. And it only RAGED the 11th floor. Stop exaggerating it. One other fact: 343 Firefighters died in the Twin Towers on 9/11, that's almost 3x the entire turnout for you silly 1975 fire.
So you think that ...( 23 hours ago by waltthefart333)
So you think that bulding was that pourly build?
Believe whatever ...( 17 hours ago by davelyng)
Believe whatever you want to believe. Feed into the paranoia. Let it consume you until you have a heart attack.
What does your ...( 14 hours ago by sprayem)
What does your friends dying have to do with WHO knocked the towers down?
see a shrink( 14 hours ago by MTMMelvin)
see a shrink
'everything you ...( 14 hours ago by MTMMelvin)
'everything you thought you knew was a lie'? stop watching films, and stop trying to be Columbo
Odd, I always hear ...( 12 hours ago by antiklaus)
Odd, I always hear the firemen being truncated in the official story... or simply not included. The videos of firefighters saying "keep your eyes on that building, it's about to blow up" or "Like pools of lava" ring a bell? Or better still "Calling the FEMA and NIST reports "A half-baked farce" from the highest ranking fireman of the day - excluded from any later reports. I assure you I am snipping nothing. I've actually read all of the NIST report... and you?
Odd, the 1993 ...( 12 hours ago by antiklaus)
Odd, the 1993 bombing was done with help from the FBI. They cooked the bomb, told the terrorists where to place them, and told their double agent to ALLOW the attack to succeed. All of this was recorded, on tape... and even reported on at the time.
Cuddle - take your ...( 12 hours ago by antiklaus)
Cuddle - take your shill account away from here. I had friends die there, and the families want answers... ones that the government has gone through great lengths to hide, and even greater lengths to cloud with bullshit like yours. If this were merely paranoid bullshit, then why is the NIST report not admissible in court? Simple. Because it would crumble under cross-examination, and you could bring in all the "experts" and congressmen and hold them accountable for their obvious lies.
Good point, of ...( 12 hours ago by antiklaus)
Good point, of course, but the poster was a shill, so he was lying anyways. I would think the victims families would be happy to get at the truth - instead of the thousands of inconsistent reports and analyses to come from the government... which of course are in multiple dozens of revisions. The government cannot even agree on a fucking timeline of events, even when the phone logs have been available since 9/11... and has had to revise them dozens of times and still can't make them line up.
I was quoting ...( 12 hours ago by antiklaus)
I was quoting firefighters. The article in the NY Times about the 1975 fire called it "a very extreme fire" that was spread over floors from the 9th to the 19th. Again, to quote firefighters who made it to the impact site "I see small scattered pockets of fire. Two lines should be able to put this down." The damage from the planes was irrelevant. And we know this for MANY reasons. 1) The buildings instantly stabilized. 2) There is clear evidence the load had been redistributed. 3) No tilt.
Just die, shill. ...( 12 hours ago by antiklaus)
Just die, shill. Seriously. Die.
How odd it is then, ...( 11 hours ago by sbrenn)
How odd it is then, that in the latest Loose Change film, they had to include a statement up front, stating the firemen didn't agree whith what was suggested. And pools of lava and calling a report a farce doesn't mean the government was in on it. Just a guy with an attitude or ten reasons for that pool to form. But please... believe what you want. I don't lose any sleep over it. I'm afraid you will be posting vids in 40 years time.
Thank you for ...( 10 hours ago by JoeMiozza)
Thank you for highlighting my point. You say the 'load was redistributed'. With the damage almost exclusively on one side, the loads on the remaining structure were tremendous, but also there within amplified through leverage due to UNEVEN redistribution if the load. Keep in mind we are towards the top of the building where the columns are the narrowest, then burn the remaining structure in a jet-fuel fed fire. The fire hardly has to be as hot or long. So, not 'irrelevant', just 'in addition to'
Learn some physics, ...( 10 hours ago by meepage332)
Learn some physics, metal loses about half its strength under intense heat. 11/9 was caused by angry terrorists not the American Government.
1. Here the BBC ...( 9 hours ago by louislode)
1. Here the BBC reports live on the morning of 9/11 that the "Salomon" building 7 has collapsed, while it is still seen standing behind their lady reporter. The reporter read all the "news" off the prompter right above the lens of the camera. This "news" item was released a bit too early, a small glitch in the overall near perfect timing of the whole propaganda operation.
2. Just before the ...( 8 hours ago by louislode)
2. Just before the building actually collapsed the BBC transmission was "mysteriously" broken off completely.(I am not aware of such a thing happening before nor after.) But it had to be done, otherwise it would become too obvious that scenario had been pre-written... Google: BBC report on building 7.
Also notice that ...( 8 hours ago by louislode)
Also notice that the insider "expert" is asked if he thinks explosive devices were placed in the buildings. The perpetrators new that this thought would come op in peoples minds later. To which question the "expert" therefore immediately without the slightest hesitation answers "No.." to wipe that thought of the republic's awareness. They had it all figured out beforehand psychologically. Typical of propaganda.
I think this guy ...( 7 hours ago by MyWhalecrap)
I think this guy thinks too much of big words he might not understand.
Wow, 50% huh? So a ...( 5 hours ago by antiklaus)
Wow, 50% huh? So a building built with 20 times the capability of supporting the weight loses half of that capability... That still means it could hold 10 more times. Totally insufficient weakening to cause systemic collapse.
dude i love you , ...( 2 hours ago by qkk20)
dude i love you , yeah by now it should be more than obious for people too know that it was an inside job, nut remember a lot of people in america , have been turned to zombies, just like the movies ,they are warnings now the robocops will come, and the aliens and a lot of different shit!
It sucked.
What foreknoledge? They hit the WTC once before and wanted to finish the job. It's as simple as that. And the fact the US drilled for such an event means it was conceivable.
Physics will show you that a falling structure of that size won't be stopped by floors, not even slow down enough to measure.
All the stuff that need to happen for the conspiracy to work is much more elaborate than the simple fact that cavemen can be smart.
I wonder why?
And enough with the 1975 fire. There were NO STRUCTURAL FAILURES, impacts, and no jet fuel in conjunction. And it only RAGED the 11th floor. Stop exaggerating it.
One other fact: 343 Firefighters died in the Twin Towers on 9/11, that's almost 3x the entire turnout for you silly 1975 fire.
stop watching films, and stop trying to be Columbo
The videos of firefighters saying "keep your eyes on that building, it's about to blow up"
or
"Like pools of lava" ring a bell?
Or better still
"Calling the FEMA and NIST reports "A half-baked farce" from the highest ranking fireman of the day - excluded from any later reports.
I assure you I am snipping nothing. I've actually read all of the NIST report... and you?
All of this was recorded, on tape... and even reported on at the time.
If this were merely paranoid bullshit, then why is the NIST report not admissible in court?
Simple. Because it would crumble under cross-examination, and you could bring in all the "experts" and congressmen and hold them accountable for their obvious lies.
I would think the victims families would be happy to get at the truth - instead of the thousands of inconsistent reports and analyses to come from the government... which of course are in multiple dozens of revisions.
The government cannot even agree on a fucking timeline of events, even when the phone logs have been available since 9/11... and has had to revise them dozens of times and still can't make them line up.
Again, to quote firefighters who made it to the impact site "I see small scattered pockets of fire. Two lines should be able to put this down."
The damage from the planes was irrelevant. And we know this for MANY reasons.
1) The buildings instantly stabilized.
2) There is clear evidence the load had been redistributed.
3) No tilt.
And pools of lava and calling a report a farce doesn't mean the government was in on it. Just a guy with an attitude or ten reasons for that pool to form.
But please... believe what you want. I don't lose any sleep over it. I'm afraid you will be posting vids in 40 years time.
Google: BBC report on building 7.
They had it all figured out beforehand psychologically. Typical of propaganda.
That still means it could hold 10 more times.
Totally insufficient weakening to cause systemic collapse.